whether The North Face Outlet the notices to the Chicago office of defendants were waived or not; but It Is sure that at least by the th day of September the appellant knew if he ever knew at all that said engine did not comply with the warranty and that the experts could not make it so comply. Under the contract it was his plain duty upon discovering that it did not comply with the warranty and could not be made to do so to have returned this machinery immediately which did not mean aboutdays thereafter. Brown v. RussellIndN. EFinding no error In the record North Face Outlet Store the Judgment and order appealed from are The North Face Outlet Store affirmed.WILCOX v. McCAIN LAND & LIVE STOCK CO. et al. NoSupreme Court of South Dakota. Aug. A renewal of a note is the giving of a new note in the place of Nike Max Air 90 the former one and Nike Argentina a contract for renewal contemplates a new note to which the parties are the same but is not an agreement for an extension.Ed. Note.For other cases see Bills and Notes Cent. Dig. Dec. Dig. g .For other definitions see Words and Phrases First and Second Series Renewal..Under his receipt reciting that a note executed by a corporation maker and Nike Shop by individual sureties might be renewed if the interest was paid in full and the corporation was solvent at the time of renewal the holder was not required to accept a renewal note except under the conditions named in such receipt and then only in case it was executed by all the parties executing the first note.Ed. Note.For other cases see Bills and Notes Cent. Dig. Dec. Dig. ® .. TRIALoRECEPTIONOFEVIDENCEPREDICATELETTERSCOPY.In an action North Face Outlet on a note where defendant sureties set up the holders agreement to renew it apurported copy of a letter written by the corporation maker to the holder after the note had become due to the effect that the interestEaid for the first extension of the note which ad been found by a defendant in a letter tile of his deceased father an officer of the corporation accustomed to keep copies of its correspondence was Ralph Lauren Outlet inadmissible where it did not appear that the original was ever mailed to plaintiff as claimed as there was no proper foundation for its admission.Ed. Note.For other cases see Trial Cent Dig.; Dec. Dig. EVIDENCEIn an action on a note where it appeared that the holder had agreed to Nike Free renew it on conditions the makers letter to the holder construing the word renewed in the holders receipt as intended for the word extended was inadmissible in the absence of any evidence in relation to the holders answer or the nature thereof as the letter constituted no proof of an agreement for an extension.Ed. Note.For other cases see Evidence Cent. Dig.; Dec. Dig. ©.. JRENEWALEVIDENCEPAYMENT.Payment of accrued interest by the maker does not prove that the time for payment of his note was extended.Ed. Note.For other cases see Bills and Notes. Cent Dig. S ; Dec. Dig. BILLSANDNOTESDISCHARGEOFSURETIESEXTENSIONCONSIDERATION.That the holder of a note extended the time for Polo Ralph Lauren Outlet payment and allowed the maker to pay the interest thereon without the knowledge of the sureties was not a sufficient consideration for an extension of the time of Note.For other cases see Bills and Notes Cent. Dig. Dec. Dig. «.. HARMLESSERRORINSTRUCTIONS.In an action on a note erroneous instructions that payment of interest proved an extension of the note and that the makers payment of interest without the knowledge of the sureties was a sufficient consideration for an extension in the absence of any other instruction as to evidence of extension or any instruction which read with the Polo Outlet Online instruction on consideration told the jury that mere payment Nike Max Air of past interest was no consideration Ralph Lauren Outlet Online for an extension were prejudicial.Ed. Note.For other cases see Appeal and Error Cent. Dig.; Dec. Dig. gl.Under the makers agreement that a note might be renewed if the interest was paid Nike Free Run in full and the maker was solvent at